Charles McFARLAND wrote: > In my reply to you,i thought that i wrote " the one i have stores 750mg", > Reading that ,which do you think i have installed ?? > In my first letter to you i said i cannot get it mounted. What does that > say my troubles are?? > In the next note i was asked how it was installed? And my reply was that > it was internal. Knowing that how do you think it is installed considering > it is not raid capable??? > then i started get down play which i really did not need. Yes you > displeased me greatly. ( not angered) I wanted help !!! and it seemed you > were incapable of understanding m problem---then i get a arrogant > I deleted > your question because it did not meet my standard.. So i replied to show > that you do not raise your esteem by stepping on me--YOU DO NOT KNOW ME...i > bite then roar. Maybe that is not right but My GOD did not make me perfect. > > Later > Charlie
Ok, what does the little cable thingy look like that connects it to the computer? In this case size doesn't matter as much as interface. There are numerous people that monitor this list that will help you, but you have to give _ALL_ the pertinent information, and the drive interface is more pertinent than the size of the drive. Do you know if it has a scsi card? Do a "grep hd /var/log/dmesg" and see if it shows up in that file. -- Mark Wolfe Lakeside, Ca. http://www.wolfenet.org gpg fingerprint = 42B6 EFEB 5414 AA18 01B7 64AC EF46 F7E6 82F6 8C71 As usual, this being a 1.3.x release, I haven't even compiled this kernel yet. So if it works, you should be doubly impressed. (Linus Torvalds, announcing kernel 1.3.3 on the linux-kernel mailing list.) -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-newbie
