On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:59:31PM -0700, Neil Schneider wrote: > > Lan Barnes said: > > > Hosting the server just made the SDCS agenda as I have been reminded > > that the present situation is ... not ideal. > > > > If we are to rehost, I might suggest Linux for the security bump. But > > KPLUG's server -- I donno. Not the best political air about it. Maybe > > it's time to pay for colo. > > I'm sorry, I'm either thick headed or just stupid. What has politics > to do with it? Why should we have to pay for colo, when it's donated > by a member. KPLUG is a SIG of SDCS and by exztension that server > belongs to SDCS, since it belongs to KPLUG. > > Am I missing something here?
Yup. People's feelings. Who wants KPLUG to take over the SDCS? If I were a member of PCLUG, for example, I might feel like I'd traded one oppressor for another. So let's go with the sensitivity thingie here. Paying for colo (or trying to get another server donated) is a small price to avoid the appearance of yet another takeover. -- Lan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Guy, SCM Specialist 858-354-0616 -- KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
