> (not sure who wrote that, or when or where...)
Sitaker, "blogging via IRC" <http://lists.canonical.org/pipermail/kragen-hacks/2002-November/000358.html> I'm pretty bad at attributions when I think the context is clear. (In this case, when something is from one of the kragen-* lists.) Partly, that's avoiding the pretty common mistake of misattribution. Partly, that's because I believe that ideas can often stand independently of who** typed them. Partly, that's just plain laziness. -Dave ::::: * <http://www.canonical.org/~kragen/mailing-lists.html> ** Mark Vonnegut, in _The Eden Express_, wrote about how good hippies didn't have last names, but no matter how hard *he* tried to be a good hippy, introductions would always involve something like "this is Matt, and this is Sarah, and this is Mark Vonnegut". ::::: ...and, while I'm making links explicit, <http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2002/11/19/2002-11-19.html#1037741001.540023> mentions the "bet that computers we buy in 50 years will be able to display HTML"; the justification for my position is: "Re: XML Killing the Web" <http://www.xent.com/FoRK-archive/oct00/0555.html> (to answer the question at the end of that page: <http://home.pipeline.com/~hbaker1/home.html>)
