what happened to all the planes that used to be parked along the highway?
for that matter where's all the planes next to the hangars...
any hangars open / for sale?

On 5/6/2013 5:11 PM, Jeff Scott wrote:
> Something to remember is that Continental also made a GO-300 that uses the 
> same rods and bearings, and a slightly different piston.  Same compression, 
> not really any beefier, but turns 3100 or 3200 RPMs.  They are also a 1200 
> hour TBO, just for comparisons sake, and often times don't make that.  As Edd 
> says, the loads go up dramatically with RPMs, so running them hard and fast 
> is a great way to make a really reliable engine into a not so reliable 
> engine.  And the failure mode of a rod or valve failure is not a pleasant 
> thing to experience in flight.  Horse power isn't going to get you much in 
> the way of speed.  Aerodynamics will get you speed.  HP is good for climb 
> performance.  I prefer to work at aerodynamic clean up to make the plane go 
> fast and rarely push my engine beyond the recommended rpm range. Your mileage 
> may vary.
>
> -Jeff Scott
> Los Alamos, NM
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: edd_wood at talk21.com
>> Sent: 05/06/13 04:48 PM
>> To: KRnet
>> Subject: Re: KR> 0=200 rpm limit
>>
>> The greatest load on an engine is at TDC on the exhaust stroke, believe it 
>> or not, and the load is tensile. The 0200 is a relatively large capacity 
>> engine with just four cylinders which means the pistons are large and heavy 
>> which means large tensile loads. The load is squared with the increase in 
>> revs which means that increased revs puts a massive load on the con rods 
>> which in turn leads to engine failure. The beauty of most aircraft piston 
>> engines is the low output, low stress characteristics which is why they are 
>> so reliable. If you want to tune an engine for high horsepower/revs in 
>> relation to it's capacity then an aircraft engine is not the way to go.
>>   
>>
>> --- On Mon, 6/5/13, Larry&Sallie Flesner <flesner at frontier.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Larry&Sallie Flesner <flesner at frontier.com>
>>> Subject: KR> 0=200 rpm limit
>>> To: "KRnet" <krnet at list.krnet.org>
>>> Date: Monday, 6 May, 2013, 23:14
>>> At 01:49 PM 5/6/2013, you wrote:
>>>> For the 0-200 what IS the limiting factor for rpm?
>>> With most road engines
>>>> it's valve float.
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> I've always heard it was valve float.  Crank them up
>>> till you can't
>>> get any more rpm and they race them all season like
>>> that.  If you
>>> have a need for that much more speed, simply set an earlier
>>> departure time. :-)
>>>
>>> Larry Flesner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
>>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
>>> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org
>>> to change options
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
>> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
>> options
>
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options



Reply via email to