> there's no reason to disparage the KR2S and the improvements that have been > gained in the twenty years since the "most recent" plans were > published...unless you have some KR-2s you want to sell... > > Mark Langford
You have a good point Mark, some improvements are good, and needed in some things. There are people out there that will 100,000 plus for a legend Cub, but you can find a good referb Cub or Super Cub and they could save a ton of money. I will never discourage a person on this net for wanting the best for themselves. I will also not discourage a person who wants to build a "stock KR". The first big expense to build a KR is the wood. Like I said I have projects for sale and it is not to make money. The sole purpose was to save projects from the fire pit, and to help people. I guess my point is there are still people that would like to build a stock KR and it would fit their needs. I have a good example, there are no piston engine powered Lancair Evolutions built or sold. We have a 4P customer who purchased the first one to be built. My question is why would you need a piston powered pressurized airplane? Answer he does not make long trips and does not need a turbine. My question what about resale. Answer, he does not care. This guy will fly the wings off this plane. The point I'm trying to make is there are all kinds of people out there who want what they want. I hope they can get unbiased opinions and they can make a choice. On a lighter note my engine is ready to go on and I still need to fix my VE cowl. I'm looking at making the gathering this year to take my whippings. Period
