Hi Virgil
The KR2 apparently suffers from too much pitch sensitivity.
Later designs resulted in the KR2S which has a longer fuselage length
increasing the moment arm of the tail. Another idea was too increase the
surface area of the horizontal stabilizer (see Mark Langford's
discussion about this).
Since my A/C body is already built, option 2 is my only option. I know
one can get used to the sensitivity but in the early stages we that are
used to C172's struggle (so I am told). Having the CoG in the front also
helps.
I hope I answered your question?
Deon
On 12/01/2017 15:55, Virgil N. Salisbury via KRnet wrote:
What pitch sensitivity ? Virg
On 1/12/2017 1:47 AM, Deon-tsrc via KRnet wrote:
Good day
I was thinking that in the process I should reduce pitch sensitivity by
enlarging the tail area as well. So removing the aft spar of the
horizontal stabilizer and install a longer one.
Suggestions?
Regards
Deon
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
change options
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
change options
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
