At 02:31 PM 1/11/2014, you wrote: >Can anyone here shed some light on to the pros or cons of the KR1 VS >the KR 100 and what changed from the KR1 to the KR 100? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
considerable info with photos at http://www.krnet.org/krs/kr100/ Latest info is that the aircraft is out of registration and located in Arizona. I recall 100 hp is the smallest engine recommended. You could duplicate it with a KR2S narrowed to a single place and use the new airfoil. that would make a real hotrod. I recall the only KR100 to fly used the RAF48 airfoil with a modified lead edge. Personally, I think a standard KR2, narrowed to a single place, with slightly enlarged tail surfaces, would make a fast little bird with almost any engine bigger than a 2100 VW, a Corvair or Continental making it a real streaker. Larry Flesner
