Unless you come in under about 525 empty a 65 horse is not enough. I am one 
that believes more hp more speed. I built my kr for speed. Weighed 480 at first 
flight. 1836 65hp. Then 2180 75hp. After 6 engine failures ( i ran them wide 
open) i went with a cont 85 broke a crank. Went with an O200. Should have done 
that from the beginning. I know have les palmers weigh in at 950 and has a sub 
ej22 will cruise at 160 mph top out at 185 mph level flight have had it to 215 
mph.    

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 17, 2016, at 4:00 PM, don january via KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Keep 65 HP in mind, any more the KR doesn't need
> --------------------------------------------
> On Sun, 4/17/16, krnet-request at list.krnet.org <krnet-request at 
> list.krnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Subject: KRnet Digest, Vol 4, Issue 100
> To: krnet at list.krnet.org
> Date: Sunday, April 17, 2016, 11:00 AM
> 
> Send KRnet mailing list submissions
> to
>     krnet at list.krnet.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
> to
>     krnet-request at list.krnet.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     krnet-owner at list.krnet.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific
> than "Re: Contents of KRnet digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1.  94x82 vs 92x82 (svd)
>    2. Re:  94x82 vs 92x82 (Mark
> Langford)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:31:56 -0700
> From: svd <osprey220 at yahoo.com>
> To: "krnet at list.krnet.org"
> <krnet at list.krnet.org>
> Subject: KR> 94x82 vs 92x82
> Message-ID: <BF6418A0-E0FE-476C-834D-6E8D0FC63510 at yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> 
> Is there any downside to moving to the 94mm cylinders vs
> 92mm's?  My son?s project currently has the 92x82 for
> 2180cc.  I can move to 94x82 for about the same cost as
> sticking with 92x82 in an upcoming rebuild. 
> 
> I?ve read that the 94mm cylinders are preferred because they
> are thicker walled.  
> 
> I am considering a pretty serious rebuild of the HAPI engine
> that came with my son?s KR project.
> 
> Specifically, we are intending to replace the crank and prop
> hub (with GP Top Bug and Force One), cylinder heads (with
> ?), alternator with GP, and cylinders with nikasil?s (not
> the LN Nikies).
> 
> Since the case will have to be machined to accept the Force
> One prop hub, shouldn?t be too much more to machine for the
> 94?s.
> 
> Cheers,
> Owen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:28:53 -0500
> From: "Mark Langford" <ML at N56ML.com>
> To: "'KRnet'" <krnet at list.krnet.org>
> Subject: Re: KR> 94x82 vs 92x82
> Message-ID: <6657B9D418D943CE96CBB3D7C757FBFD at BASE755>
> Content-Type: text/plain;   
> charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Owen wrote:
> 
>>> Is there any downside to moving to the 94mm
> cylinders vs 92mm's?  My son's
> project currently has the 92x82 for 2180cc.  I can move
> to 94x82 for about
> the same cost as sticking with 92x82 in an upcoming
> rebuild.<<
> 
> Several of us are running 94mm cylinders on the Corvair with
> no problems at
> all.  You'll probably go through at least two sets of
> VW heads before you
> need to touch the pistons/cylinders.  They are well
> proven.  I put 550 hours
> on a set in N56ML and they still look great and have great
> compression.
> 
> I've built two GPASC engines (and torn them both down
> several times for hub
> issues), and if I were going to build another VW, I'd use
> the Revmaster
> crank and prop hub setup instead.  
> 
> Mark Langford
> ML at N56ML.com
> http://www.n56ml.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> See KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet at list.krnet.org
> http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of KRnet Digest, Vol 4, Issue 100
> *************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options


Reply via email to