I believe the book you might be thinking of is Ladislao Pazmany's LIGHT AIRPLANE DESIGN, page 44.
-Lloyd Schultz Mark Langford wrote: > "Tail volume coeffiecient" might be what y'all are grasping for. I don't > have that stuff in front of me at the moment (I'm in El Paso, for some > reason), but I recall seeing a list of tail volume coefficients for various > planes in one of the design books that ran the gamut from docile to radical > (Spitfire, maybe), and the KR had even LESS than anything else on the list. > Now tail volume is not as accurate as stability derivatives, but it's an > indication, and the KR was completely off the scale... > > Mark Langford > mailto:[email protected] > see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford > > _______________________________________________ > see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
