About that corvair. Go here http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/corvair/index.html
Keep in mind that WW found that 100 and 120HP is the max HP it can produce and be reliable. I would like to have a CS prop and be able to spin the engine faster for take off and such but time will tell. Justin N116JW www.geocities.com/attngrabber14/Home ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:40 AM Subject: KR>KR Questions - Stick Control - Prop > Looks like it will be official.. I will be a KR Builder by the end of the > weekend, I am purchasing a partially completed kit and will be hauling it home > this weekend! > > A couple of quick questions from a beginning KR builder!- > > >From the article Mark Langford put up on his website (I think by Neal) - it > appears that the stick control is over sensitive - 3/4" in either direction is > all that is needed to fly the KR most of the time. It would seem that it > would make sense to shorten the hinge length/bellcrank distance so it would not be > so sensitive, or have a progressive linkage if you couldn't get full motion > out of the ailerons in a reasonable motion length... > > > Also on the corvair aircraft engine, it seems like the RPMs for aircraft are > lower and a higher RPM could yield a lot more horsepower. I understand the > prop tip speed limitation, but would it make sense to have a shorter diameter > prop with more blades? would that allow higher rpm and still obtain the same > bite, without exceeding the maximum efficient tip speed??? I see the composite > propellers often could have up to six blades - was just thinking about four! > > John Monday > Laguna Beach CA > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html >
