Colin,
While thinking of your Lap Belt Support, I thought of
another more likely scenario where you could end up in
serious difficulty with the method that you chose to
attach your belts.  You appear to be a fairly
significantly sized individual, you probably weigh a
little over 200 lbs?  Ask any of the flying KR pilots
what its like to hit turbulence in one of these little
birds.  Everyone of them will tell you it's not fun,
maybe even downright scarey.
With a lap belt attached through the rear spar, (yes,
you should put doublers made out of plywood and or
aluminum angle) you would be assured that the lap belt
attachment stays put, therefore keeping you restrained
when you encounter turbulence.
  If memory serves, isn't the KR designed to carry -4
G's?  That means that attachment must be designed to
carry at a minimum 1200 lbs ((200 x 4)x 1.5)=1200 lbs.
 This is the load per side i.e. pilot only.  Lets say
you're carrying a 150 lb passenger.  Add another 900
lbs limit load to the same crossmember, skin and lower
longeron, and you're up to 2100 lbs.  That's at only
-4 G's If you look at the 7 G case, you're looking at
2100 lbs on your side alone, 3675 combined limit load.
The main problem that I see with the crossmember
approach that you have made is that you place the lap
belt fasteners in tension, not shear. The whole
installation is a tension load.
   Generally speaking, if you load identical
fasteners, one in shear, one in tension, the tension
loaded fastener will fail at around 75% of the shear
loaded fastener.  Some people will want to argue about
it, but ask any engineer, they will tell you that it's
a much more effective joint in shear than in tension,
which is why we always try to design our joints for
shear. The strength department typically knocks down
our fastener allowables  by as much as 50% when the
fastener is tension loaded.
OK, so how would that equate to your installation?
Double the limit combined load, that is what you have
to design that structure for or 7350 lbs.
  The lower longerons and skin were never designed to
carry that kind of point load.
--- Colin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes it does Dana, and they are straight back from
> individual belts to their own brackets on a angle
> bracket attached to the longerons.
> Colin & Bev Rainey KR2(td)
> [email protected]


=====
Scott Cable
KR-2S # 735
Wright City, MO
[email protected]

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to