Another possibility is drag on the undercarriage.

..............................................

Roger that John - u/c drag - relatively large wheels on a meaningful
moment arm - makes sense.  Wonder if we can talk him into rigging
something that will dump the legs in flight?.  Maybe point out the
tremendous value this info will have for all the others!!!

I am still surprised - this airplane has a healthy positive incidence
(3.5) even considering the 3 degs washout (that only  really starts
after the stub wing).  The airplane still wants a wee bit of up trim in
the cruise and MORE up trim when the power component is removed.  The
u/c drag is very real, but it is a constant (for a given speed) and will
not have changed (in fact, it will be reducing with the sq of any speed
reduction).

Maybe the prop wash over the elevator (she is relatively short coupled)?

Given the performance and general handling, Larry has a very nice
airplane.  When I think about it - 156mph dinkum GS (8 way GPS).  That
is something better than 140 KTAS - pretty good for an O-200 powered
bird with rigid legs.  It can only get better from here on - spats,
fairings etc - the sort of things homebuilders tend to do.  Problem is,
he is having so much fun right now that could not be bothered.


I have heard it said that many home builders are disappointed when they
get the bird flying, but will never admit it.  When I saw that Larry F
was considering selling the delightful airborne milk stool - I knew for
sure that he was totally delighted with his KR.

Steve J



Reply via email to