Duncan

The undercarriage height is influenced by a few
things, but the two issues in this case:

The Original KR1 and 2 had a low tech, low cost, very
simple retract system that was almost great.  Many
KR's are still flying with these folding
legs(taildragger).

The simplicity of the design dictated that they were
pretty short (stubby) and thus a the very low sit on
the ground.  No other reason.

For what it is worth, I thought this was a great
concept until it became clear that there was no real
speed advantage in this particular case.  Pity. coz
that is the whole idea behind a retractable u/c.

So - the original KR's were squat simply coz it suited
the landing gear as designed and supplied by Kenny
Rand.

The next issue is propeller ground clearance.  With
the original direct drive VW engines it was neccessary
to let them step out a bit (rev up) to develop the hp.
 We never want our propeller (tips) to go supersonic
(or even close) so the faster we turn the prop, the
smaller the diameter needs to be.  The smaller the
diameter, the smaller the circumference, the less feet
travelled during one rotation, the less feet travelled
per minute, the lower the tip velocity (for a given
rpm)  As a consequence, prop diameters were relatively
modest and the squat landing gear was not really an
issue.

Some builders used different motors like the C65/85
and O-200/235 that needed a bigger prop.  Similarly,
redrives emerged that facilitated slower prop rpm on
auto engines, so bigger (longer) propellers were back
in fashion.

The folding legs soon gave way to the variety of
attractive and effective (rugged) u/c configurations
we see today.   Even if the original folding legs had
been popular, they would have presented a problem for
the new breed of power plants.  The u/c simply needed
to be taller.

A fixed u/c presents drag in proportion to its size
(and length)-so most builders will only accept what
they need for enough propeller clearance.

Ed






___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! 
Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Reply via email to