Netters
Unfortunately I have to agree with the local jurisdiction on their decision to 
prohibit the repair and construction of cars, trucks, and now light aircraft 
outside of a building and the storage of such items in side or backyards, 
regardless of its intended use.

In cities like Jacksonville, where it is already a severe problem that vehicles 
of all kinds find "themselves" first parked and then later, parted out as 
"project" cars or trucks, to open up the possibility of someone finding a loop 
hole to exploit, so that now they can have a auto repair shop in their back 
yard, or driveway, due to undefined "projects" present, would end up a massive 
problem for all residential property owners.  My old subdivision was governed 
by the City of Sanford Florida. They had a city ordinance that no repairs to 
any automobile, truck, or "vehicle" including trailers, could be accomplished 
in the open in your driveway.  Any repairs desired could be accomplished inside 
an enclosed garage or out building, to include project car restorations, and 
specifically my airplane in my single car garage. They knew about my plane, and 
openly stated that as long as it was never stored outside, or that repairs and 
construction were conducted inside the garage, that I was fine and within the 
law. They KNEW it would or could take years to finish; that was okay.

By prohibiting the storage of parts of anything, planes or cars, or machines, 
in the opne side or back yards, or in the driveways of residential homes is 
nothing more than legislation that protects home owner values.  When it is 
inside your garage, out of sight from your neighbor, and they want to 
interfere, it is a violation of your civil rights. When your neighbor can see 
it, and can find it an eye sore, even if it is not one, then you are 
encroaching on your neighbor's rights. You might not like him storing a sign 
promoting Gay Rights propped against the side of his house, facing yours. To 
him, he might find your partially assembled plane peeking out from under a 
cover, just as offensive.

WE HAVE TO UNDERSTAND that many people DO NOT share our passion for flying, nor 
do they understand our commitment to its enjoyment.  We already have too many 
pilots who beligerently assert their right to fly, even though they have been 
asked to conduct such operations with noise abatement, but disregard this 
request saying it is their right to fly!  Years later the airport is shut down 
because there is only several hundred pilot votes to remain open, compared to 
many thousands non-pilot votes to close the airport.

Like it or not, these are our neighbors. We have to find a way to compromise, 
or solos like the one that just happened are going to gradually become less and 
less frequent.  They will just lock us out of their airspace, and then who 
knows what next....

Sorry about the length; but I can see both sides, and I have BEEN on the 
enforcement side. For every situation that has merit, there are 10 that are 
just blatent violations. We have to work with administrations for the common 
good, just like we work with the FAA, though we don't always agree with them....

Colin Rainey
N96TA
Ormond Beach, FL



Reply via email to