Craig Williams wrote:

>> Are we using 25-33% MAC for the CG range on the AS5046 airfoil? I setting up a new datum and rechecking moment arms locations for an updated POH.<<

I've got too much on my plate to check right now, and it's been a looooong time since we did that, but the basic premise of the new airfoil is that it was a direct "swap-in" for the RAF48, with regards to lift coefficient, moment, etc, and I believe that includes the CG range (modified to remove the aft two inches). The answer is probably shown in the data at or in the links at the bottom of that page. I do know that Troy Petteway swapped it in for the RAF48 with no issue at all, and I'm sure he's not the only one.....that's essentially what we've all done. Wherever the templates show the spars, that's where the the templates are mounted.

Mark Langford

Search the KRnet Archives at
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at
see to change 
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to

Reply via email to