On 4/21/2019 3:54 PM, Mike T via KRnet wrote:
The "critic" is spouting nonsense. Some aerobatic planes have symmetrical
wings with no difference between the top and bottom. Do they need to have
their wings angled at 45 degrees?
Mike Taglieri
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Anyone looking at an F-104 wing can only
chuckle at the word Bernoulli.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I'm beginning to think we "all" need to disregard our outdated beliefs
and check out some more modern research to explain lift. That might help
to explain both examples above.
https://phys.org/news/2012-01-wings.html
Larry Flesner
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to [email protected]