After rethinking it was swift fuel replacement for 100LL not ul94. I
will not use ethonal in fiberglasstanks. Sorry for the confusion.Joe.
-----------------------------------------From: "Kayak via KRnet"
To: "KRnet"
Cc: "Kayak"
Sent: Sunday February 2 2020 10:09:58AM
Subject: Re: KR> Engine Compression ratio increase effect
Hi Joe, what was the original O-320 compression ratio and HP. IIRC
there
was 150 and 160 hp. I'm wondering how you'd notice what looks by
numbers to
be a relatively small increase. How much did top speed and climb rate
change?
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 9:16 AM Joe via KRnet wrote:
> I tried in and have seen no difference in performance when I had my
> O-320 with low compression.I have not tested with the new engine. I
> boosted to 160 hp and high compression pistons. Love the
performance
> but have not tried since rebuilding the engine.
> Joe Malsack
>
>
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at
http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org [1] to
change options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to
[email protected]
Links:
------
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
/> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at </a><a target=
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to [email protected]
