"Will the authorities not allow you to test you aircraft to determine if it 
meets the requirements.  It seems absurd that they disqualify your KR based on 
information from a totally different airplane and even yours with a 
non-calibrated and questionable ASI system not even knowing the temp and 
pressure altitude.  I've never flown an airplane where the ASI seemed anyway 
near accurate at the stall.  Isn't that a bit like the judge accepting your ex 
wife's side of the story in a divorce settlement?  Nothing against ex wives but 
hey.............

Larry Flesner"


Hi Larry


Alas no - the aircraft has to be registered in an airworthiness category before 
it can fly.


I would like to register it as a Class One Microlight (like all of the KR-2's 
in NZ).  The corollary of this is that after it is so registered, the CAA need 
never have anything to do with the aeroplane ever again.  It doesn't even need 
a flight permit - only an annual inspection which I can do myself if I can't 
find another local inspector.  This is good for me and surely good for the 
Authority as it is less administrative nuisance.


The CAA however, have suggested that I register it as 'Special Category - 
Amateur Built,' which is more or less what it was when it last flew.  Now 
unless the Authority are prepared to accept the original airworthiness 
certificate as being non-terminating - and I don't believe it was - a new can 
of worms opens for which the Authority have not provided any direction.  Long 
story short, to be registered as 'Special Category - Amateur Built' - the way 
the rules are currently written - I would need to declare that I have built 51% 
of the aeroplane.  Which I did not.  The implication now is that I need to 
dismantle the aircraft to rebuild 51% of it and so be able to apply for this 
categorisation.  Which is of course ludicrous.  Not to mention the axiomatic 
burden of additional cost which comes with any association with CAA bureaucracy.


So you are of course correct - the situation is absurd.  If the aeroplane is 
incapable of stalling at 45 knots indicated or below then I will pull my head 
in and do as asked.  If however, there is weight of evidence to suggest that 
the designer's stalling speed is correct then I am not the sort of pussy that 
accepts a sour bowl of milk!


Thanks for your interest


Kiwi





-- 
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to