On 9/25/06, Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry for taking so long. lost in the mail...
i applied the patch, without the constuctor stuff. i'd appriciate if you
tell me if it works without changing the flags.
although, if it does work, it still has no bearing on the search dialog situation right?
thanks
--
Shie Erlich
Shie Erlich wrote:
> On 9/8/06, Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Shie Erlich wrote:
> > > On 8/29/06, Jiri Palecek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Karai Csaba wrote:
> > > > > Yes. The searcher, packer, synchronizer widgets are non-modals.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's why you can search / pack / synchronize in the background...
> > > >
> > > > But being a dialog (or WM_TRANSIENT_FOR the main window), you
> > > > cannot move them behind the main widget and/or minimize them
> > > > without minimizing the main widget.
> > >
> > >
> > > i'm able to put krusader to the forground easily. just alt-tab and
> > that's
> > > it.
> >
> > This greatly depends on the windowmanager you're using. In kwm (or
> > what the KDE default is called), it works. I use openbox and it
> > doesn't work there. Neither does in metacity, the gnome default.
> > Even Qt documentation says that dialogs share their taskbar entry with
> > their parent -- which is what kwm fails to do. If it shared, it would
> > not be possible to switch to krusader. You could somewhat ameliorate
> > the situation by making the viewer NOT child of krusader. You can
> > switch to viewer then but not to krsader (or, to be more precise -- you
> >
> > can switch everywhere, but the dialog is still shown in front).
>
>
> i never knew that was a problem, since i didn't use other window managers.
>
> can you provide a patch to the way it does work on openwm or whatever wm you
> do use?
Hello.
Well, the WM name is openbox. A patch which "somewhat ameliorates",
eg. does not solve the problem completely, is at
http://www.ms.mff.cuni.cz/~palej3am/krusader_dialog.patch
It merely changes the parent of the viewer. Maybe (I'm not sure),
changing the flags in the constructor is unnecessary.
sorry for taking so long. lost in the mail...
i applied the patch, without the constuctor stuff. i'd appriciate if you
tell me if it works without changing the flags.
although, if it does work, it still has no bearing on the search dialog situation right?
thanks
--
http://www.krusader.org/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "krusader-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to krusader-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/krusader-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---