Those messages are correct. They are the result of the recent layoffs at Sun.
Those accounts were removed from the system over the weekend. Derek Jennifer Pioch wrote: > The email servers at Sun have problems, can someone look at it, please? > > Jenny > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Internet Mail Delivery <postmaster at brm-avmta-1.central.sun.com> > Date: Jan 27, 2009 6:09 PM > Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed > To: piochjennifer at googlemail.com > > > This report relates to a message you sent with the following header > fields: > > Message-id: <67079b830901270909o5a8527aet76b459422140d71a at mail.gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:09:24 +0100 > > From: Jennifer Pioch <piochjennifer at googlemail.com> > > To: April Chin <April.Chin at sun.com> > Subject: Re: WebRTI: RTI 328911 was resubmitted by April.Chin at Sun.COM > > > Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: > > Recipient address: @sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:April.Chin at sun.com > Original address: April.Chin at sun.com > Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address > Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.1.1 > <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:April.Chin at sun.com>... User unknown > Remote system: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com > (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25) > Recipient address: @sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:craig.mohrman at sun.com > Original address: craig.mohrman at sun.com > Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address > Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.1.1 > <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:craig.mohrman at sun.com>... User unknown > Remote system: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com > (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25) > > > Original-recipient: rfc822;April.Chin at sun.com > Final-recipient: rfc822;@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:April.Chin at sun.com > Action: failed > Status: 5.1.1 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address) > Remote-MTA: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com > (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25) > Diagnostic-code: smtp;550 5.1.1 > <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:April.Chin at sun.com>... User unknown > > Original-recipient: rfc822;craig.mohrman at sun.com > Final-recipient: rfc822;@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:craig.mohrman at sun.com > Action: failed > Status: 5.1.1 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address) > Remote-MTA: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com > (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25) > Diagnostic-code: smtp;550 5.1.1 > <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:craig.mohrman at sun.com>... User unknown > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jennifer Pioch <piochjennifer at googlemail.com> > To: April Chin <April.Chin at sun.com> > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:09:24 +0100 > Subject: Re: WebRTI: RTI 328911 was resubmitted by April.Chin at Sun.COM > April, can I use it? > > On 1/13/09, Jennifer Pioch <piochjennifer at googlemail.com> wrote: > > April, can I use the RTI in the public? > > > > Jenny > > > > > > On 12/23/08, April Chin <April.Chin at sun.com> wrote: > > > John, > > > > > > I don't think the RTI contains any non-public info, and it is already > > > being CC'd to outside folks (code reviewers). It does > reference OSR info, > > > which I normally put in the private bug Comments field. > > > > > > Do you see any problem with cc-ing RTI's on opensolaris mailing lists? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > April > > > > > > > > > > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:12:22 +0100 > > > > From: Jennifer Pioch <piochjennifer at googlemail.com> > > > > Subject: Re: WebRTI: RTI 328911 was resubmitted by > April.Chin at Sun.COM > > > > To: April Chin <April.Chin at sun.com> > > > > Cc: alan.hargreaves at sun.com, craig.mohrman at sun.com, > iszczesniak at gmail.com, > > > james.d.carlson at sun.com, mark.j.nelson at sun.com, mike.kupfer at > > > sun.com, > > > roland.mainz at nrubsig.org > > > > Content-disposition: inline > > > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=googlemail.com; > > > s=gamma; > h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to > > > :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type > > > :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; > > > bh=TsGApMdTORlxNXKCy8tRlBcsUZIpU9pXDxUAj39QMU0=; > > > b=eoNCgsyT2keRzH02RSSi3Ekw5sjLvGBU42mjUrUaWQ4KEnCIUmdbLu9c/xRU8c1Hk3 > > > qtIGXrJWYuoeJgNGzjLH8nXT7L1zX409y80rmwNMuW3yzqhP1fr/GDNtvn2k+m2j407m > > > 2V2YVmhtWuZPYJCZpminfUIyS5I6b5bf3xdFw= > > > > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; > d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; > > > h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version > > > :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition > :references; > > > b=KTsH8W4pepJ98EeMA2yp7ESZBBVl+3ckWAf3banP27K82fPkKkXMCRv8JY/fvtAKIa > > > rjW3XEyU0IHsD4grgImjFEZW9vRnjITVZXtaI+S63Hkkls2kWa/p2q4CyhTLoeLDD95q > > > v8Q2Vo+SbKHUgM//yrM9zwdzn4kJb66D3xeSk= > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/23/08, April Chin <April.Chin at sun.com> wrote: > > > > > I apologize for the multiple WebRTI submissions... > > > > > it seems the "hg outgoing -v" output (1900 files) > > > > > is too large for the > > > > > "putback -n" field, and it was getting truncated. > > > > > > > > > > So I'm putting "putback -n" overflow into the Comments field, > > > > > although I apparently can only add one Comment at a time, so I > need > > > > > to resubmit again... > > > > > > > > > > Please bear with me. > > > > > > > > I do. Can you include > ksh93-integration-discusss at mail.opensolaris.org > > > > to the list of RTI recipients so the RTI process is archived? I am > > > > giving a talk as part of a graded performance test and wish to > use the > > > > RTI as reference material. > > > > > > > > Jenny > > > > -- > > > > Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt > > > > > -- > Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt > > >
