Glenn Fowler wrote:
> we don't have standalone fts_* tests
> but do have ast { cksum find pax tw } tests that exercise fts_*,
> either directly, or through the ~200 line ftwalk() wrapper
>
This sounds like pretty good coverage. If Sun did not already start
running these as per-build "PIT" tests in the first ksh93 stage, it may
make sense to import into the test harness as part of transitioning
interactive commands to libshell/libcmd.
> -- Glenn Fowler -- AT&T Research, Florham Park NJ --
>
> On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT) April Chin wrote:
>
>> For the contract manager on our end, you can
>> put down my manager, Tim Sparlin.
>>
>
>
Thanks, that sounds good.
>> Are there existing tests for the fts_*() interfaces that we can run
>> before integrating libast changes into Solaris? If not, we can also
>> run some bart tests.
>>
I'd like to have bart tests verify a manifest is the same after a
xsltproc(1) sort which should verify fts_* is working with regards to
the comparison function.
-Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list
> ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss
>
