Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> Are you using (populating) anything in /usr/shell as part of this case? >> >> If not, you might consider running that as a separate fast track. > > Without that portion, this case is pretty much an automatic-approval case > to upgrade to the latest upstream, but since the project team wanted to do > both at once, I saw no harm in having a combined fast track. Is there a > reason to split now? Is the ARC going to want to derail or deny that > portion, but not the rest?
I'm happy with the answer for /usr/lib/shell/ rather than /usr/share/lib/shell/. -- Darren J Moffat
