Garrett D'Amore wrote: > HOWEVER, I recognize that this is Volatile, subject to change, and I > won't press too heavily for the above details.
I think this last bit is where Roland (et.al.) want to play test ideas simply because they don't have a spec in mind right now... I personally don't believe that a non-trivial generic posix shell-agnostic library can actually be written today given the differences between all the various "sh-like" shells, but I'd be very happy to be proven wrong :-) -John
