>Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >> >>> ls(1) is also special in that by default you get the 32-bit version -- >>> you have to explicitly run the 64-bit version if you want that version. >> >> And that's only because of some benchmark (kenbus?) > >Even on AMD64, or that's just the way it was on SPARC?
It's the exec, I think, not the different flavor of the executable. Casper
