"Roger A. Faulkner" wrote: > > I filed a bug against Solaris 11 (aka nevada): > > > > 6488832 posix_spawn() should return better error codes > > > > I'll have the fix put back into Solaris 11 (nevada) > > in build 53. I'll also arrange to back-port the fix > > to some update of Solaris 10. > > Ok, it's done. The fix is in build 53 of Solaris 11 > (coming your way soon via Solaris Express).
Ok... the next ast-ksh update (or better: The regeneration of the headers) should pick this change up then... > Now, a question for you: > Is the ksh93 project targeting Solaris 10 or not? > If not, there is nothing more for me to do. > If so, I have to arrange to back-port the fix > to an update release of Solaris 10 (Update 4 > would be the target) and create a patch. Yes, we're still aiming at a backport. And it may be nice to get this fixed in Solaris 10 anyway since it would affect standalone builds of ksh93 (and other shells/applications), too. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
