ok I guess we'll have one more alpha for roland to test and then a public alpha for wider distribution
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:52:41 +0100 Roland Mainz wrote: > Craig Mohrman wrote: > > >On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:33:23 -0800 (PST) Craig Mohrman wrote: > > >> ## Running i386/ksh test: LANG='en_US' script='basic.sh' > > >> # test ../../../lib/libshell/common/tests/basic.sh begins > > >> # basic.sh[283]: both jobs not reported > > >> # test ../../../lib/libshell/common/tests/basic.sh failed with exit > > >> code 1 > > >> [ 67 tests 1 error ] > > > > > >this is a test bug as opposed to a ksh93 bug > > >the latest alpha update from a few days ago has an updated > > >ksh93/tests/basic.sh which should fix this problem > > > > > >what is the src chain of command after I notify Roland of an alpha update? > > >(I notify Roland first because he quickly builds and filters out > > > stupid bugs on my part) > > > > I thought I saw this roll in but I checked again and apparently not. > > > > Roland, > > I'm using revision 536. Does this have Glenn's fix? > No, the ksh93-integration prototype004 tree is exactly in sync with > ast-ksh/20061031 (which predates the fix for the "basic.sh" test and > other changes). I update the tree only for the public (alpha) releases > and not each single snapshot generated for testing (otherwise testing > would occupy most of my free time... ;-( ). > ---- > Bye, > Roland > -- > __ . . __ > (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org > \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer > /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 > (;O/ \/ \O;)
