Roland Mainz wrote: > I just filed a bug > (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6437624) > which should be used for the initial/first putback of ksh93+libshell.so > to get them introduced into OS/Net. > My idea is to simply put ksh93 to /usr/bin/ksh93 and introduce > libshell.so - and then work on issues such as localisation of ksh93 > (l10n), |libc::wordexp()| and the update/switch of /usr/bin/ksh to ksh93 > status as later steps. > > Comments/suggestions/ideas welcome... :-) > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: CR 6437624 Created P3 opensolaris/triage-queue RFE: Add ksh93 > (as /usr/bin/ksh93) and libshell.so to OS/Net > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:32:53 -0600 (MDT) > From: Linda.Bernal at Sun.COM > To: john.levon at sun.com, Linda.Bernal at Sun.COM, liane.praza at sun.com, > Karyn.Ritter at Sun.COM, Alan.Hargreaves at Sun.COM, jonathan.adams at > sun.com, > opensolaris-bugs-triage at sun.com > > *Synopsis*: RFE: Add ksh93 (as /usr/bin/ksh93) and libshell.so to OS/Net > http://bt2ws.central.sun.com/CrPrint?id=6437624 >
... and I forgot to CC: April... mea culpa... ;-( In the meantime someone (who ? xx@@@!!!) closed the RFE with "Closed, duplicate of 4113420" - which is IMO totally WRONG. - http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4113420 is about getting /usr/bin/ksh updated to ksh93 and therefore it begins with "It's about time we upgrade /bin/ksh." - http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6437624 is about getting ksh93+libshell.so added to OS/Net (as /usr/bin/ksh93 for now, e.g. /usr/bin/ksh will not be touched). It's a part of bug #4113420 but ONLY the first step... ... can someone please re-open bug #643762, please ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
