Pablo M?ndez Hern?ndez wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 16:59, James Carlson<carlsonj at workingcode.com> 
> wrote:
> > On Jul 2, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> 
> > wrote:
> >> James Carlson wrote:
> >>> Peter Tribble writes:
> >>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:32 AM, <David.Comay at sun.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If anything, moving bits out of *both* SUNWesu and SUNWcsu and into a
> >>> clearer-headed "SUNWksh93" (or some such) would make more sense.
> >>
> >> Somehow I dislike the name "SUNWksh93" since the content (and the
> >> project's scope) somehow mutated into something a lot larger in the last
> >> couple of years and it doesn't seperate between libraries and
> >> commands...
> >> ... what about "SUNWastlibs" and "SUNWposixcmd" ?
> >
> > Those sound great!
> 
> What I don't like about that approach is that someone who will search
> for the ksh package won't be able to find it easily...

Erm... both /usr/bin/ksh and /usr/bin/ksh93 are _always_ installed
(removing them would break the system in fundamental ways (e.g. some
libc functions rely on them)).

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 3992797
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

Reply via email to