> > It's fine to make use of the ksh builtin support for various commands, but > > can we please learn from the problems that occurred when we changed sleep > > to be a builtin recently (e.g. 6793120) and instead create trivial wrapper > > *programs* that access the builtin functionality through libshell? > > I already have a fix (tested and queued for my sponsor) for CR #6793120 > which does something similar as you've proposed...
So there is a unique pid for each program and thus it can still be pkill'd? -- meem
