Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >>> A while aho when I was in MPK there was a discussion whether it would
> >>> make sense to rip-out the existing |libc::malloc()| and port the libast
> >>> implementation over to libc. The only problem so far was finding enougth
> >>> free time to do it... ;-(
> >> I think I'd rather see libumem replace the default allocator.
> >
> > Erm... libast's allocator and libumem have similar debugging features
> > while libast AFAIK avoids fragmentation better and is async-signal safe.
> > Maybe we should do some kind of hybrid with libast's algorithm and
> > libumem's debugging features...
> 
> libumem also provides the umem_cache_alloc() functionality it isn't just
> a DEBUG/alternate malloc/free so libast's algorithm + libumem's debug
> features isn't enough to replace libumem.

Uhm... AFAIK libast has something similar with the |stak*()| stuff.

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 3992797
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

Reply via email to