On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:35:41PM -0800, Jonathan Adams wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:38:49PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > > Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:03:25AM -0500, Glenn Fowler wrote: > > > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:30:48 -0800 Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > [snip] > > > > can you run the same test with libumem configured with sbrk() vs mmap()? > > > > > > hm. i just upgraded my desktop from 106 to 107 and i can't reproduce the > > > problem there anymore, but the good news is i can still reproduce it on > > > another > > > machine running 108. > > > > Is this a _debug_ build of B108 ? > > > > > it doesn't seem to matter if we use mmap or sbrk. > > > > > > ---8<--- > > > edp at jurassic-x4600$ UMEM_OPTIONS=sbrk LC_ALL=en_US.ISO8859-1 /bin/time > > > /bin/sleep 1 > > > time: command terminated abnormally. > > This is an incorrect invocation; it should be: > > UMEM_OPTIONS=backend=sbrk, or UMEM_OPTIONS=backend=mmap >
oops. thanks for the corection jonathan. using the correct invocations, i just verified that we still core dump regardless of what backend allocation method we use. ed
