Nils Goroll wrote: > thank you for you responses, I had included in my original post the version > output of > /usr/bin/ksh, which is indeed ksh93. > > My question was more about the build process and why current opensolaris (aka > indiana) > builds don't include all ksh flavors. > > Is there a reason? Can anyone provide pointers?
See http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/2008-November/006580.html for my reply... > Otherwise could those responsible for > indiana builds simply set ON_BUILD_KSH93_AS_BINKSH=1 in > usr/src/Makefile.ksh93switch > please? Please ask David Comay <David.Comay at sun.com> to add hardlinks from { /usr/bin/pfksh, /usr/bin/pfksh93, /usr/bin/pfrksh, /usr/bin/pfrksh93 } to /usr/bin/ksh93 in http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2031 once the ksh93-integration update1 lands in OS/Net. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
