Danek Duvall wrote: [snip] > > # ident "@(#)exception_list 1.76 06/09/13 SMI" > > @@ -53,11 +53,18 @@ > > # > > # Ignore everything under trees that may be resynched from outside ON. > > # > > +./src/cmd/ast > > +./src/cmd/ksh > > ./src/cmd/perl > > ./src/cmd/svc/configd/sqlite > > ./src/cmd/tcpd > > ./src/common/openssl > > ./src/grub > > +./src/lib/libast > > +./src/lib/libcmd > > +./src/lib/libdll > > +./src/lib/libpp > > +./src/lib/libshell > > ./src/uts/intel/sys/acpi > > > > I'm therefore cc-ing the gatekeepers alias for this... > > > > > > > > Otherwise I can't see how that would be the case, given that we *know* > > > some > > > of the files being introduced are unreferenced by the build... > > > > Yes, this was puzzling to us as well--neither I nor Roland saw > > anything listed for "unreferenced files" for our nightly builds > > (with -f option) based on his workspace. > > Yeah, well, that'll do it. I'm not thrilled by the blanket coverage, even > with the obvious precedents.
Well, how do the options look like ? If the files start showing up in the unreferenced file list someone may want to get them ripped-out sooner or later which ruines our abilty to deploy updates quick&painless (and I am not thrilled about that idea (and I am not really happy about the idea that you're unhappy about the current situation (which means I can only pick the issue why I am unhappy... ;-( Grumpf... ;-( ))). ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
