Mike Kupfer wrote: [snip] > But I could also live with allowing unused makefiles, as long as it's > clear to someone who is unfamiliar with the component (ksh93 in this > case) that the makefiles are in fact unused. > > Perhaps the way forward is to do some analysis of the unreferenced files > (which you requested in other mail). If we end up stripping out a bunch > more files (as a result of that analysis), then I guess there's not much > point in keeping the makefiles.
Please please please... could we avoid stripping files and discussing this option over and over again ? This is really a path which quickly leads down to the lower portions of hell (and I don't like it that warm... (this feels like discussing the recipe in front of the animal which is going to be cooked (alive))). ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
