On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:38:09 +0100 Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > Glenn Fowler <gsf at research.att.com> wrote: > > is there any expectation that a call to wordexp() would/could/should modify > > the stdin/stdout/stderr buffer state of the caller at all? > > > > if a call to wordexp() does not touch the caller's stdio state > > why would it matter what io mechanism is used? > > the wordexp() implementation is free to use raw fd io, no? > > assuming proper cleanup on woreexp/wordfree return, > > how could the caller know that something other than stdio was used?
> I was asuming from Rolands mail that there is such a problem as I have a > problem with libfind.... the difference is that libfind has stdio expectations and wordexp() does not
