James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote:
> > OK, if I get the right to block the RTI for the next unplanned (*) Sun tar,
> > I have no problem with this point of view. If this is not possible, it
> > would
> > help a lot if there was a more realistic approach.
>
> What on Earth is an "unplanned Sun tar?" It boggles the mind.
Unplanned is simular to planless and this is what I would call the Sun tar
extensions I have in mind. They are based on deprecated methods 6 years after
the deprecation was official and 8 years after the fact of the deprecation was
known. We live in the time POSIX.1-2001 and no longer in POSIX.1-1988 time.
> The whole point there is reaching consensus, not fighting.
I was in hope that this will be already possible. Unfortunately a fight was
started that will not bring us towards an OpenSolaris that is created in
cooperation of poeple from Sun and the external community.
We need cooperation and dicsussions between experts.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
