I've taken psarc-ext off of the cc list, since this seems off-topic for the case.
>>>>> "Roland" == Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> writes: Roland> Joseph Kowalski wrote: >> For projects to be integrated into the trunk, they should be as >> perfect as possible. The catch phrase within the ON group of Solaris >> is "FCS quality at all time". I think "perfect as possible" is an overstatement. "FCS quality all the time" certainly allows for phased deliveries. And I would argue that there is some room for putting back something in order to get feedback and experience that we can't otherwise get or find a substitute for. IMO opinion the criteria means this (no more and no less): anything we integrate into the trunk, it should be something we're willing to ship to customers. Roland> I think it may be interesting to revisit the issue later (after Roland> our putback is done) and look whether we can do any Roland> optimisations... Yes, this would definitely be a good thing to do. I can already think of one suggestion (don't wait until the code is "done" to have the ARC review). cheers, mike
