>>>>> "April" == April Chin <April.Chin at eng.sun.com> writes:
April> I'm not sure if we need to explicitly track in bugzilla the parts April> of the process that are a given for any putback (testing, code April> review, RTI), unless you think it may be useful. IMO, the main advantage of putting these things into bugs.grommit.com is that it provides a shared space for you and Roland to track the remaining tasks--you don't have to worry about keeping private lists in sync via email. It also makes the process a little more transparent for everyone else (many of whom aren't familiar with the process for putting back into ON). Note that there is a "tracking" category, which you could use for things like code review and testing. Between that and bugzilla's ability to track dependencies, it looks like you can use bugzilla as a general project planning tool. (Too bad it doesn't generate Pert or Gantt charts.) But I'm okay either way (use it or not). cheers, mike
