Felix Schulte wrote: > On 31 Oct 2006 11:59:59 -0500 (EST), Dave Morano <morano at computer.org> > wrote: >> Stephan Titard wrote: >> >> > on cygwin, ksh93r does 500 iterations in 1.73s (1.06s with no field >> > splitting), pdksh in 2.06s(1.8s) and bash >> > in 18.23s(4.7s) >> > on HP-UX 11.00 the system ksh (Version 11/16/88) runs about 10 times >> > slower than ksh93p+ >> > exhibiting non-linear behavior as n increases...(seems it does leak >> too) >> > on solaris 5.8 the system ksh (88f) starts leaking badly and dumps >> core... >> >> Wow! :-) >> >> The leak and core dump on the old Solaris version of KSH-88 is just >> another reason to try to get it replaced with KSH-93 as soon as >> possible! :-) > > Tell that Sun. They are still proud to deliver their broken ksh88 junk > with Solaris and claim that this is in the best interest of their > customers
And what exactly do you bring to the table other than needlessly cross-posting to unrelated mailing lists and inciting flame wars? -steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
