We cannot integrate the ksh93 code until it is approved by the ARC.
The changes we document in the PSARC case should be
a document of the interfaces being added to Solaris/Open Solaris.
It cannot be a document of interfaces we may or may not putback.
Right now, Roland & I are working with our sponsor on some issues 
with aspects of what is currently proposed, some of which have
been worked out, some of which have not.
I'll post more details on the ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list.

Remember that we are looking at ksh93 as an eventual replacement to
/usr/bin/ksh, so it is different than integrating another
alternate shell that people can use if they wish.  It will
replace a shell that people are already using in particular ways.

That does not mean that we cannot change anything after we putback,
but the basics have to be there to set up the correct expectations.

        April

> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; 
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-t
ype:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; 
b=hZOmiDiKjeNHIcg4C3riwRVRXXMgxleYWsovglO1HNOEI1immnEMW0YfLWtYWPDQMZAYJ2xJr10SSZ
aysY0YDHU5vCCZ5EMz+OUv0x1A44sDWxWsT3874j/Yd3QefOi3FVL0txqSuncaOkF2Zf6b6+zqLWBqw+
nZN5fLRrKjIRI=
> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:40:45 +0200
> From: "Martin Schaffstall" <martin.schaffstall at googlemail.com>
> To: "April Chin" <April.Chin at eng.sun.com>
> Subject: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] ksh93 integration status
> Cc: ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org, 
opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris.org
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> On 8/9/06, April Chin <April.Chin at eng.sun.com> wrote:
> > Some issues/work are still unresolved and are being investigated/discussed,
> > including (but not limited to) manpage changes, putting ksh93 on /sbin,
> > and 64-bit ksh93.  Hopefully these can be finished/resolved by the
> > end of the week.  I know people are anxious to get ksh93 integrated,
> > but doing it right involves some time.
> 
> Why isn't it possible to upload the current version to Opensolaris and
> do further fine tuning later? The project seems to be a in a good
> shape and EVERYONE is complaining about the delays
> -- 
>      //   Martin Schaffstall
>     //    EMail: martin.schaffstall at googlemail.com
> \\ //
>  \X/


Reply via email to