> My understanding is that we do not need to include these built-ins in the > ARC case, since they are not enabled by default. > However, if we do include them in the case, we need to document them, > and we did not intend to make this into a documented feature of ksh93.
By enabled by default, you mean that a ksh93 user will not see this normally since /usr/ast/bin is not part of their standard path, correct? That said, the behavior that ksh93 will trigger its internal built-in behavior (which again seems rather unintuitive) is going to be putback. That does constitute an interface in my mind in that the user is able to change the behavior of ksh93. I believe there are certain ARC members on this thread so I'll defer to them on this point. dsc
