John Beck wrote: > JohnS> ... I was under the impression that code should > JohnS> never make reference to the bug it fixes. Am I mistaken here? > > No, you are quite correct. Referring to an open bug e.g.: > > /* > * Work around silly misfeature until 6999999 is fixed. > */ > > is OK, but the comment proposed in this case is not. Something like: > > /* > * Allocate one extra array entry to keep gcc happy. > */ > > should suffice.
Is the new webrev (http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/ksh93_integration_cr_6799167_003/) Ok for you ? It refernces an open bug instead of the one used for the putback... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
