>Ignacio Marambio Cat=E1n <darkjoker at gmail.com> wrote: > >> why are we having this argument? I believe it leads nowhere. Any op= >en >> source tool aiming to replace the closed bits should just go throug= >h >> formal review like the rest of the changes do. These discussions ar= >e a >> waste of time and bandwidth > >star did pass such a review in 2004 already. Let us implement the sta= >r=20 >integration.
I have given this answer before, and the answer is: "do the work", " publish the results", "get a codereviewer", "get a sponsor". Casper
