Danek Duvall writes: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 08:34:08PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > > > What about "contracts" between individual projects, e.g. dtksh vs. ksh93 > > in OS/Net or dbx vs. ksh93 in OS/Net ? Would that be a justification to > > ship the lint libraries (I guess the answer is "no") ? > > > > Alternatively we could create something like a > > "SUNWastprivateplayground" (e.g. "AST private API playground") package > > which provides the private API add-ones as a seperate package stored at > > the project website... > > ... would it be allowed to have the package build pieces for such a > > thing in usr/src/pgkdefs/ (e.g. we built the package but do not ship it > > with Solaris nor ARC it (for now)) ? > > Sure. We've got about a dozen packages like that right now. At least one > of them (SUNWwbint) is used as part of the admin gate's CBE.
Don't forget SUNWzoneint. > But I thought > that's what SUNWastdev was all about. Unfortunately, SUNWastdev is in SUNWCdev -- it's intended to be delivered to customers who can't actually use it. Yes, in a better world, I think SUNWastdev is exactly where such bits would go. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677