Knut,

Sorry for the late reply...your questions were already answered 
accurately by others (thanks).

I've re-opened your RFE 646407 with the new Synopsis 
*sh* migrate /bin/sh to ksh93
which does not make reference to when this RFE will be integrated.

Thanks,
        April
        
> X-Original-To: ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> Delivered-To: ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; 
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-tra
nsfer-encoding:content-disposition; 
b=HhBVrxGBLOyOB98bBYwORvudrtl+oOf4elCCH3JEE/vZsoNv0uNzNo00UN9MonaQhOK1CME2UdfWT6
7PVK+QlbQh/qO/z7qFaimy4Xq8ArurwhITxA5VK7vlBsd2j0fc/u8Ne4kL5C3A4a9/Ti3gOaTmILwdQZ
Beg/sZu2Lpi54=
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:49:44 +0100
> From: "Knut Reinert" <knut.reinert at gmail.com>
> To: ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Subject: [ksh93-integration-discuss] CR 6486407 rejected
> X-BeenThere: ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
> List-Id: Korn Shell 93 integration/migration project discussion 
<ksh93-integration-discuss.opensolaris.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss>, 
<mailto:ksh93-integration-discuss-request at 
opensolaris.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss>
> List-Post: <mailto:ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org>
> List-Help: 
<mailto:ksh93-integration-discuss-request at opensolaris.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss>, 
<mailto:ksh93-integration-discuss-request at opensolaris.org?subject=subscribe>
> 
> ksh fans,
> Recalling my idea about migrating /bin/sh to ksh93 before /bin/ksh, I
> afraid to say that CR 6486407 has been closed as 'Closed, not a bug'.
> Can someone please explain why this Rfe was rejected?
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Linda Bernal <Linda.Bernal at sun.com>
> Date: Oct 26, 2006 12:34 AM
> Subject: [Fwd: CR 6486407 *HOT* Created P1 opensolaris/triage-queue
> Proposal: Migrating /bin/sh to ksh93 before /bin/ksh]
> To: knut.reinert at gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *Synopsis*: Proposal: Migrating /bin/sh to ksh93 before /bin/ksh
> http://bt2ws.central.sun.com/CrPrint?id=6486407
> 
> This is a high priority CR and requires your immediate attention.
> Please evaluate it as soon as possible.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> *Change Request ID*: 6486407
> 
> *Synopsis*: Proposal: Migrating /bin/sh to ksh93 before /bin/ksh
> 
>   Product: solaris
>   Category: opensolaris
>   Subcategory: triage-queue
>   Type: RFE
>   Subtype:
>   Status: 1-Dispatched
>   Substatus:
>   Priority: 1-Very High
>   Introduced In Release:
>   Introduced In Build:
>   Responsible Manager: karyn.ritter at sun.com
>   Responsible Engineer:
>   Initial Evaluator: opensolaris-bugs-triage at sun.com
>   Keywords: opensolaris
> 
> === *Description* ============================================================
> Category
>    shell
> Sub-Category
>    bourne
> Description
>    Based on the earlier discussion about the migration of /bin/ksh I'm
> proposing to migrate /bin/sh to ksh93 before /bin/ksh. It may prove to
> be a simpler work with fewer political obstacles because the feature
> set of the Bourne shell is smaller than the set of features found in
> ksh88.
> Benefits:
> * ksh93 as /bin/sh would provide a POSIX compatible shell
> * Greater interoperability with other operating systems, including Linux
> * Greater flexibility in script development
> * Reduced maintenance requirements (only one code base instead of two
> needs to be maintained)
> * The project would prepare the path for the larger /bin/ksh migration project
> The Bourne shell is lacking POSIX conformance and common extensions
> available on other operating systems makes it a challenge to port even
> simple applications to Solaris.
> This is multiplied by the problem that /bin/sh is the default shell
> for system calls such as popen(3c) and system(3c) or utilities like
> make(1) which cannot be changed to another shell based on a system
> wide tunable or other "easy" solutions to work around the limitations
> of the Bourne shell.
> ksh93 is open source and will be readily available in Solaris as
> /usr/bin/ksh93 soon, allowing community members to contribute fixes,
> resulting in a better quality default shell for Solaris.
> In addition to many new features, a couple problems already described
> in the Sun bug database are fixed in ksh93, including:
> * Bug ID: 4088172 *sh* request to have /usr/bin/sh be a POSIX shell
> * Bug ID: 6378708 *sh* could implement non-conflicting posix syntax
> * Bug ID: 6398988 /bin/sh should support $(), just like POSIX
> Regards,
> Knut
> Frequency
>    Always
> Regression
>    No
> Steps to Reproduce
>    see description
> Expected Result
>    see description
> Actual Result
>    see description
> Error Message(s)
>    none
> Test Case
>    see description
> Workaround
>    none
> Submitter wants to work on bug
>    No
> Additional configuration information
>    see description
> 
> *** (#1 of 1): 2006-10-25 23:25:37 GMT+00:00 linda.bernal at sun.com
> *** Last Edit: 2006-10-25 23:25:37 GMT+00:00 linda.bernal at sun.com
> 
> 
> === *Comments* ===============================================================
> 
> === *Evaluation* =============================================================
> 
> === *Suggested Fix* ==========================================================
> 
> === *Workaround* =============================================================
> 
> === *Justification* ==========================================================
> Priority changed from [] to [1-Very High]
> ?
> linda.bernal at sun.com 2006-10-25 23:25:37 GMT
> 
> *** (#1 of 1): 2006-10-25 23:25:37 GMT+00:00 linda.bernal at sun.com
> *** Last Edit: 2006-10-25 23:25:37 GMT+00:00 linda.bernal at sun.com
> 
> 
> === *Additional Details* =====================================================
>         Targeted Release:
>         Commit To Fix In Build:
>         Fixed In Build:
>         Integrated In Build:
>         Verified In Build:
>   See Also:
>   Duplicate of:
>   Hooks:
>         Hook1:
>         Hook2:
>         Hook3:
>         Hook4:
>         Hook5:
>         Hook6: knut.reinert at gmail.com
>   Interest List:
>   Program Management:
>   Root Cause:
>   Requires Security Coordination: false
>   Fix Affects Documentation: No
>   Fix Affects Localization: No
>   Reported by:
> 
> === *History* ================================================================
>         Date Submitted: 2006-10-25 23:25:36 GMT+00:00
>         Submitted By: linda.bernal at sun.com
> 
>         Status Changed    Date Updated                  Updated By
> 
> 
> === *Solution* ===============================================================
> 
> 
> === *Service Request* ========================================================
>         ID: 1-253551606
>         Customer:
>         Account Name: opensolaris.org bug logging
>         Contact Role: D-Development
>         Impact: Critical
>         Functionality: Primary
>         Severity: 1
>         Synopsis:
>         Product Name: solaris
>         Product Release: solaris_nevada
>         Product Build: snv_01
>         Operating System: solaris_nevada
>         Hardware: generic
>         Reference Number:
>         Sun Contact: karyn.ritter at sun.com
>         Customer Contact: kreinert
>         Contact Type: E-External Customer
>         Status: Open
>         Source: BugTraq2
>         Reproducible:
>         Submitted By: linda.bernal at sun.com
>         Submitted Date: 2006-10-25 23:25:37 GMT+00:00
>         Description:
> 
> 
> === *Activity* ===============================================================
> 
> 
> === *Multiple Release (MR) Cluster* - 0 ======================================
> 
> 
> 
> === *Escalations* ============================================================
> _______________________________________________
> ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list
> ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss


Reply via email to