I. Szczesniak wrote:
>> A suggestion from a PSARC member was to keep /bin/ksh
>
> This is a suspicious suggestion. First PSARC suggested a transition
> period and now they want a 'all or nothing' solution? Is PSARC
> actually WILLING to allow the integration of ksh93 as /bin/ksh?
PSARC is a committee with a number of members - as is normal for any
collection of humans, they don't all agree on every topic and different
members will give you different suggestions. Until a formal proposal
is brought to PSARC for discussion and vote, you cannot and will not know
what "PSARC's opinion" is, and what they are willing to allow.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
