thanks I misinterpreted "fix in progress" to mean "debugging" rather than "applying the fix"
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:35:58 -0700 Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Glenn Fowler wrote: > > what is causing this flurry of reports > > many of which have been already adressed upstream > > some ~1 year ago > Those were all the updates to the existing bug reports marking them > as being fixed by the integration John and Roland are working on. > You can see the changes in the summary section at the beginning of > each one: > === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value ============= > Commit to Fix in Build snv_127 > Keyword oss-request > Keyword oss-sponsor > Responsible Engineer <User 1-7MTUEB> > Root Cause Inadequate Algorithm > See Also 6793763 > Status 7-Fix in Progress 3-Accepted > Targeted Release solaris_nevada > ====================== =========================== =========================== > So the most important change here is that the bug status went from "Accepted" > (yes, we agree it's a bug) to "Fix in Progress" (usually means fix is in > review for putback to the Solaris/OpenSolaris gate), and is marked with a > target build for that putback (Commit to Fix in Build snv_127). > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > _______________________________________________ > ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list > ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss
