On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:32:41 -0500 Roger A. Faulkner wrote:
> On 02/09/11 10:48, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Glenn Fowler<g...@research.att.com> wrote:
> > the test does not exercise the original problem
> > it doesn't even use lseek(), which is central to the problem
> I know. I already acknowledged that Solaris needs to address the
> lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR) problem, at least as a corner case.
sorry I missed that
> I was going beyond the original problem to the larger issue of
> atomicity among read(), write() and lseek() as specified in both
> the latest and the previous versions of the POSIX standard.
the test passes on (uname -a)
IRIX64 localhost 6.5 07202013 IP35
_______________________________________________
ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list
ksh93-integration-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss
