Balazs Ree wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:50:41 +0400, Vladislav Vorobiev wrote:
> 
>> In some cases this would certainly be useful. See tread with subject:
>> turn off ?kukitTimeStamp
> 
> kukitTimeStamp is a different issue. I understand why some 
> developers felt the need to get rid of it, but it was put there 
> intentionally: to ensure requests are not cacheable, even in case of a 
> foul browser and cache setup. However even if we omit it, POST requests 
> are still (supposed to be) uncacheable, so maybe it was too much 
> precaution on our side.

IIRC, the timestamp is there to turn around a bug in one of the browsers 
that does cache even when it should not.

I should have commented which browser though :-(

-- 
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
_______________________________________________
Kss-devel mailing list
Kss-devel@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/kss-devel

Reply via email to