Balazs Ree wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:50:41 +0400, Vladislav Vorobiev wrote: > >> In some cases this would certainly be useful. See tread with subject: >> turn off ?kukitTimeStamp > > kukitTimeStamp is a different issue. I understand why some > developers felt the need to get rid of it, but it was put there > intentionally: to ensure requests are not cacheable, even in case of a > foul browser and cache setup. However even if we omit it, POST requests > are still (supposed to be) uncacheable, so maybe it was too much > precaution on our side.
IIRC, the timestamp is there to turn around a bug in one of the browsers that does cache even when it should not. I should have commented which browser though :-( -- Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be _______________________________________________ Kss-devel mailing list Kss-devel@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/kss-devel
