Alan. How's it coming? I'm willing to test even half finished stuff. Alan Grimes wrote: > I've been going through a printout of Voltage Source and its related > classes to try to get a better understanding of how it could be > re-implemented in the form of a parts database entry. I keep finding > junk that I had removed in my own personal fork but which are still > present in the CVS tree... I found a tarball of what I had been passing > around before, it probably needs some tidying up before it gets put in > one of the SVN branches... If you need it, ask. -- it has problems with > it's engine though because it was a snapshot of the changes I was making > while I was rebuilding it. > > A brief profiling run on the SVN sources (using valgrind) showed that, > if I am interpreting this correctly, 23% of the execution time was taken > up in the [] methods of matrix and Vector. I'm pretty sure that my own > Qmatrix and Qvector classes optimized many of the 8 million calls to > those functions out... (and this really was a brief run...) > > Don't worry about my matrix classes messing up the engine, the results > should be identical until you start mucking with the LU decomposition > solver... > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
